Click-through vs view-through attribution: what's the difference and which counts?
Click-through attribution (CTA) credits conversions to the last ad the user intentionally clicked. View-through attribution (VTA) credits conversions when an ad was displayed but not clicked, provided the conversion occurred within a set lookback window. You should separate CTA and VTA reporting to avoid overvaluing passive ad impressions.
Detailed Explanation
In digital advertising, attribution determines which ad exposure receives credit for a customer purchase or app installation. Click-through attribution is high-intent: the user physically tapped the banner or video.
View-through attribution acknowledges that advertising has branding value: a user sees an interstitial ad, does not click it at that moment, but searches for and downloads the app three hours later on their home Wi-Fi.
However, unconstrained VTA can be easily abused by unscrupulous ad networks buying cheap, low-viewability background banners to claim credit for users who were already going to convert organically. Bidding engines should treat CTA and VTA with different valuation multipliers.
The configured time span (e.g. 7 days for click, 24 hours for view) during which an ad impression or click is eligible to claim attribution for a conversion.
Weighing CTA vs VTA in Programmatic Bidding
A campaign records 100 conversions: 60 from CTA (7-day window) and 40 from VTA (24-hour window). Target CPA is $20.00.
Applying a discount to view-through conversions prevents media waste on passive inventory.
What to Do Next
- 1Audit your MMP settings and ensure VTA windows are capped at 24 hours (never 7 or 30 days).
- 2Review your DSP reporting breakdown to inspect pure CTA CPA vs blended CPA.
- 3Configure Rule Engine constraints to discount or exclude placements with high VTA but zero CTA.
Related Questions
CPM / CPI / CPA Converter
Model effective action costs under different click and conversion volume scenarios.